Last changed
9 April 2012 ............... Length about 800 words (8,000 bytes).
(Document started on 17 Mar 2009.)
This is a WWW document maintained by
Steve Draper, installed at http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/profile.html.
You may copy it.
How to refer to it.
Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[this page]
Related pages:
[staff maxi profiles]
[My maxi signups]
Signup deadline this year: 20 May
My profile as project supervisor
By
Steve Draper,
Department of Psychology,
University of Glasgow.
This page is to hold my profile as a project supervisor, especially a
supervisor of undergraduate level 4 maxi projects.
General areas
My general interest is in education at university level: what makes a
difference to students' learning? My
web pages as a whole
illustrate my range of interests within this.
I recently wrote 4 papers,
which indicate some recent particular interests.
And the next section gives examples of topics for future maxi projects.
I am teaching a course on
Positive Psychology. I have not yet thought of
projects I want to do myself in that area, but would consider supervising a
student in the area.
However I have quite often supervised projects in areas I knew nothing about,
if the student has come with a specific idea and not required detailed
technical knowledge from me but general support and someone to discuss their
ideas with. (A recent example was theory of mind in ravens in Edinburgh zoo.)
In fact these have been some of the best projects I've supervised. (But no
left-over clinical psychology wannabes please, especially when it is a general
interest area but not a specific project.)
Specific topics 2012-13
- Producing a test for students of qualitative understanding of psychology.
Another way of putting this is: can we invent a simple method that students
should apply to every bit of psychology they read, that summarises the
importance of a study in 1 or 2 sentences? Most only remember the "effect":
i.e. the mean effect: they remember nothing of the variation.
Even better, what kind of critical points should you routinely look for and
remember?
- Reflection e.g. keeping a learning diary. Several studies have shown that
students required to do this get sig. higher exam marks. Can we replicate
this? What kind of thinking is prompted, and why don't students do this
automatically?
- Expectation effects on learning in education.
A number of studies
have shown how a tiny intervention, sometimes only a few words, change a
learner's performance instantly and enough to change their grades. They use a
number of different theories for this. Can all these be explained as
expectation effects, and how might we apply this?
Specific topics 2011-12
- Producing a test of qualitative understanding for psychology.
Hestenes developed a test (the "FCI" = force concept inventory)
for physics at A-level / level1 HE that eventually showed that most HE
students could pass complicated looking physics questions with calculations,
but couldn't answer very simple questions that required qualitative
understanding. This so shocked some academics (when they used it on their own
classes) that it eventually led to the biggest, most powerful changes in
teaching yet reported in the literature. Could we do something similar for
psychology? It seems negligent not to try
...
This ref. gives a brief account of the method (many later papers discuss
results and developments):
Halloun,I.A. & Hestenes,D. (1985) American Journal of Physics
vol.53 no.11 pp.1043-1048
The question for the project is: can we invent an analogue for
psychology? What are the things that psychologists take for granted, but
students may not pick up at all quickly, even if they pass exams? Not
anecdote but the spread of human performance? ....
- Do a convincing test on whether and how the
AAW website
improves student writing.
- Investigate experimentally what reduces student anxiety: e.g. discussing
problems, discussing solutions, being made aware of support services, ....
Specific topics 2010-11
- There's a very promising project in progress offering students online
self-help for basic writing skills (since staff mostly refuse to help, yet
students know they want to get better). The feedback seems great, but a
direct controlled test would be good. So at least three kinds of project: a)
controlled experiment, using the materials, seeing whether students' writing
actually gets better if they study these materials (vs. just practising); b)
collecting data from students in departments that have this installed: what
are their attitudes, do they think they are getting better at writing, ....;
c) What do students in general feel about such self-help facilities for skills
such as writing/
- Summer projects: I may also have some summer studentships on education
topics.
- Ditto for a spin-off offering self-help on basic maths (actually
numeracy) especially for psychology students doing stats.
- I now have a contact in the university counselling service
.
who expressed some interest in co-supervising projects.
These are unlikely to involve contact with clients, but to study things such
as how useful the service seems to be to third parties such as academics;
or running experiments designed to cast light on the peculiar properties of
dialogue in counselling (e.g. that it is all about one person, and not about
reciprocity as in normal conversations).
Specific topics 2009-10
-
Dweck's "mindsets", and related studies.
- Peer assisted learning; study groups (what makes them really valuable,
or not).
- What aspects of group work matter for learning?
- I'm interested in a project (following up on one this year) on: when
will students who don't know each other nevertheless spontaneously collaborate
on a task, and when is their judgement right or wrong as to whether this will
improve their task performance? What role does shyness play (if any) in this?
- I'm collaborating with
Jaye Richards, a teacher in a secondary school on
the south side, who has demonstrated major learning gains using a VLE in her
classes. There will be more research to do on what exactly the important
features of her new method are, perhaps following up a classroom
observational project. See
here
and
here.
- How does feedback to students actually work? Is it really as important
as the literature believes? is it always important, or just in some
circumstances? When it helps, what are the conditions e.g. having a 2-way
conversation not just a set of written comments?
- Creating (developing, piloting, testing) workshops for students that
increase their study skills, exam skills, justified self-confidence in their
knowledge and ability as students. I have done a few of these: many more
would be good.
Still wider general areas
In the past I have done research in HCI (human computer interaction) and
related topics. I have supervised a PhD on nutrition labels on food packages;
and 2 PhDs at the Art School: one on
education in the Art school (including a
study we did with a maxi student),
and one on
a theory of individual differences in approaches to design.
Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[this page]
[Top of this page]