Last changed 17 Oct 2016 ............... Length about 1,000 words (11,000 bytes).
(Document started on 4 Feb 2007.) This is a WWW document maintained by Steve Draper, installed at http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/localed/dweck.html. You may copy it. How to refer to it.

Web site logical path: [www.psy.gla.ac.uk] [~steve] [localed] [dropout] [this page] [PosPsy] [General list of educational references]

Positive psychology for educational applications

By Steve Draper,   Department of Psychology,   University of Glasgow.

There have recently been a number of studies showing dramatic direct educational effects of positive psychology interventions on educational test scores. It seems very likely that in HE these would furthermore translate into lower dropout (besides two more also described below). The Taylor & Walton (2011) study has an advance in method, where they separately measure effects on learning and test performance.

Study 1: Dweck and "mindsets"

Children (about 10 years old) did intelligence test problems (Raven's matrices): 10 problems per set, only 4 minutes allowed per set; 3 sets with intervening measures: medium hard, hard, medium hard. Different types of praise given (with the marks) after the first set: for ability, for effort, or nothing. After the second (harder) set, they were told they had done badly on that set. Then a third set (of medium difficulty comparable to the first set) was given to generate measures of the effect. On a scale of 0-10, scores went up by about 1 with the "good" intervention and down by about 1 with the "bad" intervention. It also affected their attitude of wanting to persist with such problems (scale 1-6; "How much would you like to take these problems home to work on"). And furthermore affected whether they sought information that would help them learn to be even better at the problems, or information such as how others had done that would let them judge themselves.
Immediacy: Affected later task (over about 20 minutes).
Improvement size: On a scale of 0-10, scores went up by about 1 with "good" intervention and down by about 1 with the "bad" intervention.
The content of the intervention (listening for 5 seconds):
One sentence of praise given orally by the experimenter, along with feedback (score) on a task (plus failure on the next set of tasks). All were told, after the first set, "That's a really high score"; then either "You must be smart at these problems" or nothing or "You must have worked hard at these problems". After the second set, all were told they'd done "a lot worse".
  • Mueller. M. C. & Dweck. S. C., (1998) "Praise for Intelligence can Undermine Children's Motivation and Performance" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology vol.75, No.1, pp.33-52

    Study 2: reducing underperformance by African Americans

    In a north eastern US middle school a study with 119 African American (AA) and 124 European American (EA) students and random allocation of each to control and intervention groups, with the teacher blind to this allocation, gave a 15 minute written assignment in class early in the year. The AA students with the positive psychology intervention showed about a quarter of a grade improvement in end of term grades. The effect was significant (p < 0.02), was greatest for the weakest students, and halved the number that "failed" in the sense of getting grade D or worse. There was no effect for EA students, so this intervention may not work more generally.
    Immediacy: Affected grade for the semester.
    Improvement size: One quarter of a grade; abolished 40% of the achievement gap; failure rate (D grade or worse) reduced from 20% to 9%.
    The content of the intervention (writing for 15 mins.):
    The affirmation and control exercises presented a list of values (such as relationships with friends or family or being good at art). In experiment 1, treatment students were asked to indicate their most important value, control students their least important value. In the replication study, treatment students were asked to indicate their two or three most important values, control students their two or three least important values. Treatment students in both studies then wrote a brief paragraph about why their selected value(s) were important to them. Control students wrote about why the chosen value(s) might be important to someone else. To reinforce the manipulation, students indicated their level of agreement with statements concerning their chosen value(s) (such as "I care about these values," in the treatment condition versus "some people care about these values", in the control condition).
  • Cohen,G.L., Garcia,J., Apfel,N. & Master,A. (2006) "Reducing the racial achievement gap; A social-psychological intervention" Science vol.313 p.1307-1310

    See also:
    Cohen,G.L., Steele,C.M., Ross,L.D.. (1999) "The mentor's dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide" Personality and social psychology bulletin vol.25 no.10 pp.1302-1318

    Study 3: reducing female underperformance in maths

    In Canada, women undergraduates took a test that had a maths, then a reading comprehension, then another maths test. The comprehension test was the place for the intervention, with different essays given to different (randomly assigned) groups, on the topic of gender differences in maths performance. Those getting the positive versions (arguing either that there are no real gender differences or that differences are due to experiential effects) did significantly (p < 0.02) better than the others on the second math test.
    Immediacy: Affected the next task (next few minutes).
    Improvement size: about 20% in score.
    The content of the intervention (reading or listening for 15 mins.):
    Each test condition used a different essay. Two of the essays argued that math-related sex differences were due to either genetic or experiential causes. Both essays claimed that there are sex differences in math performance of the same magnitude. One essay [a third] argued that there are no math-related gender differences. The [fourth] essay primed sex without addressing the math stereotype. (The second and third essays elicited significantly better performances than the first and fourth.)
  • Dar-Nimrod,I. & Jeine, S.J. (2006) "Exposure to scientific theories affects women's math performance" Science vol.314 p.435

    Study 4: Open University boost from emphasising strengths

    The OU study. Note that this study, unlike the 3 above, showed an effect of small size (only 4 to 5% of students) (although statistically significant, and educationally and financially worthwhile). It is also possible to reinterpret its effect: although it was designed on the basis of Dweck's ideas, it could be that the affected learners were really responding to a sign of caring by the institution rather than to a change in their own "mindsets".

    Study 5: penpal Aronson

    Aronson,J., Fried,C.B., & Good,C. (2002) "Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology vol.38 no.2 March 2002 pp.113-125

    Study 6: Mangels

    Mangels,J.A., Butterfield,B., Lamb,J., Good,C., & Dweck,C.S. (2006) "Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model" SCAN vol.1 p.75

    Study 7: Fullilove

    Fullilove,R.E., & Treisman,P.U. (1990) "Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program" Journal of Negro Education vol.59 no.3 pp.463-478

    Study 8: Dijksterhuis

    Dijksterhuis,A. & van Knippenberg,A. (1998) "The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit" J. of personality and social psychology vol.74 no.4 pp.865-877

    This comes from studies on how we unconsciously imitate others; or a stereotype. So priming people with the notion of old people makes them slow and stupid; of hooligans makes them more antisocial; of professors, improves their "cleverness".

    Study 9: Taylor & Walton

    Taylor,V.J. & Walton,G.M. (2011) "Sterotype threat undermines academic learning" Personality and social psychology bulletin vol.37 no.8 pp.1055-1067

    This study has a much improved experimental design, that separately measured how much effect the intervention had at the time of learning, and at the time of testing. It showed that it has an effect at both of these, and the effects add (roughly).

    Extras

    Web site logical path: [www.psy.gla.ac.uk] [~steve] [localed] [dropout] [this page]
    [Top of this page]