Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[apr]
[this page]
[APRintro]
[ex1]
[ex2]
[popup1]
[popup2]
[software notes]
Brief instructions
When contributing to the ranking judgements with the ACJ/APR method,
I suggest you keep these instructions open in a window.
Don't use Internet Explorer as your browser for this task: it works a lot
better on others e.g. Chrome (which is on standard university computers for
students, if you look for it).
It is often best to do your ranking (of each set) in several different fairly
short sessions, separated by hours or days.
The judgement criterion for deciding which of two samples is better
- Which is the more interesting / useful overall?
(of past years' wikis)