Web site logical path: [www.psy.gla.ac.uk] [~steve] [courses] [PosPsy] [this page]
This is my page to hold bits about our two DACE courses about the psychology of happiness, which are based on the fairly new field of Positive Psychology. ("We" are Quintin Cutts, Steve Draper, Emily Durrant, and Paddy O'Donnell. You can email to us all at "PosPsy1@psy.gla.ac.uk".) The DACE web pages will hold official descriptions of them, how to enrol, etc. On this page I discuss (with less of a word limit) what I think these courses are about.
The two courses are:
If those are reasons to join the course as a student, then what are the reasons for us to create the course and teach it? The latter mirror the former.
The content of this course: There are three kinds of content this course offers its students:
This is thus not a course about theory, but about applied psychology: the focus is not understanding but practical outcomes. And it is not a course about what experts can do to others, but about what anyone could do for themselves.
This goes with a learning design that gives equal weight to personal, practical exercises and experience, and to public, shared evidence. Thus every session should present and launch a personal exercise that students should practise themselves outside class; and also a single good published paper on evidence of the efficacy of that exercise. This, unlike most university courses, thus has a full balance as required by Laurillard between the public, abstract, conceptual form of knowledge and the personal, private, experiential side of knowledge.
We also have a longer term strategic agenda in putting on this course. Firstly to start offering a course in the important, newish area of psychology known as positive psychology. Secondly, to offer a course that fills a gap in most PDP provision for undergraduates: the aspect of helping learners relate their lives in general and their life as a student in particular to their personal long term values and goals. (Most PDP provision presupposes that everyone wants to be at university, and that everyone wants a job; and slides into instrumental actions for carrying out these assumed goals that can end up being alienating and contributing to unhappiness, not to a fulfilled life.) If this course is a success, we are likely to perpetuate it, expand it, make it more useful and more available. But all this also requires that we ourselves learn the material; develop, test, and improve the course; become skilled at putting on such courses. This course has not only a content that is new to us all, but a different audience and a different "learning design" i.e. structure and method of presentation.
The structure of each of us presenting 2 sessions, but assisting at all 8 sessions, is thus important for multiple reasons:
The general guiding inspiration is Tal's course: it has been a huge success, and we'd like to see if we can replicate that popularity with learners. His course is more than twice as long as ours just in lecture time, let alone study time; so we are selecting a subset. To do that we partly focus even more sharply on the practice<->evidence connection; but largely follow his "6 tips for happiness", which I take to represent what he thinks the top practical messages are. My new proposed design has a session on each of the 6 tips; 1 extra for meditation; 1 extra for ??
Web site logical path:
[www.psy.gla.ac.uk]
[~steve]
[courses]
[PosPsy]
[this page]
[Top of this page]