29 May 2002 ............... Length about 900 words (6000 bytes).
This is a WWW document maintained by
Steve Draper, installed at http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hci02/30words.html.
Web site logical path:
Request for 30 word description
This is a request for you to send us a 30 word description of the
value of your paper to the community.
(This is the form of this request used on authors of papers. I think I'll
leave it in that form for reference and possible other use. But if you are a
workshop author, please just adapt this request to your case; bearing in mind
these 30 word summaries will, in some forms, put workshops and papers etc.
adjacent to each other, sorted by topic or date ...)
Longer than the title and the keywords but shorter than the abstract,
it is also meant to get more directly at, not the conclusions of the
paper, but what kind or type of paper it is, and why people might want
to read it. In order to facilitate the writing of these descriptions
we would like you as authors to provide an initial 30 word description
however, these descriptions may be edited by the committee in order to
obtain consistency across all events.
In drafting your 30 words, then, the aim is to let potential readers
classify your paper instantly. Anything that lets them do that is
good. As an initial guideline, we suggest covering the following 3
- What area / topic is this about e.g. haptic interfaces, cscw,
usability methods, etc.
- What method is the paper based on e.g. describes a software design,
case study of use, reports controlled experiments, describes a design
method and experience of its first use, theoretical or conceptual
analysis, "unusually for a conference, this paper is essentially a
review of a stream of work over the last 10 years", etc.
- How widely accepted this is likely to be e.g. "continuing the
subfield of location sensing applications", "within the broad field of
heuristic evaluation, this implies that most previous studies have
been too flawed to be useful", "a controversial paper that seems/is
designed to inspire interest and loathing in equal measure depending
on the reader".
We expect these 30 words to be useful to conference delegates in
deciding what papers they want to hear or read (and even whether they
come to the conference at all), but also useful to the community as a
whole in becoming more articulate about the different kinds of value a
paper has to others.
We intend to put them on the website, in the magazine Interfaces
before the conference to build up enthusiasm, and in the final
This is an exploratory trial, adapted from an innovation in the CHI
conference: whether it is maintained will depend on how it goes this
year. Your comments will be useful.
- This workshop explores the radical new topic of literary approaches to
HCI, and may eventually affect every aspect including design methods; but
initially, will start from theory.
- This paper concerns a haptic interface technique using a new algorithm. It
describes the new software, and a controlled user trial of it with significant
results. Novel but uncontroversial.
- This theoretical piece is designed to be controversial, but does present a
novel argument about the similarity between dustmen and usability designers.
It offended some professionals and a referee, but another found it thought
Web site logical path:
[Top of this page]