Simon C. Garrod
Professor
CCNi Principal Investigator
Visiting Collaborators : Sara Bogels, Nicolas Fay

M.A. from Oxford and Ph.D. from Princeton. Holds the Chair in Cognitive Psychology and is director of the HCRC project in Glasgow. Interests in psycholinguistics include reading, particularly in relation to extended discourse, dialogue and interactive communication, and, psychological aspects of semantics.

Consultation times for students :
Simon C. Garrod is available on mondays between 10 and 12.
Simon C. Garrod
CONTACT INFO
Postal Address Room 550
Dept of Psychology
58 Hillhead Street
Glasgow
G12 8QB
Telephone +44 (0)141 330 5033
EMail address Simon.Garrod@glasgow.ac.uk
Homepage Personal website
FULL PUBLICATIONS LIST
LEGEND
Book Chapter Book chapter
Journal Publication Journal publication
Conference Presentation Conference presentation
  The full list of publications is updated by the author. Below is a list of all the publications of Simon C. Garrod that reside into our database.
  If you wish to see a partial list of the most relevant publications considering his current research interests, please click here.
Paper Fay N., Garrod S.,& Swoboda N. (2010) The interactive evolution of human communicative systems Cognitive Science Vol.34 pp 351-386 [expand abstract]
Abstract: This paper compares two explanations of the process by which human communication systems evolve: iterated learning and social collaboration. It then reports an experiment testing the social collaboration account. Participants engaged in a graphical communication task either as a member of a community, where they interacted with seven different partners drawn from the same pool, or as a member of an isolated pair, where they interacted with the same partner across the same number of games. Participants’ horizontal, pair-wise interactions led ‘bottom up’ to the creation of an effective and efficient shared sign system in the community condition. Furthermore, the community-evolved sign systems were as effective and efficient as the local sign systems developed by isolated pairs. Finally, and as predicted by a social collaboration account, and not by an iterated learning account, interaction was critical to the creation of shared sign systems, with different isolated pairs establishing different local signs systems and different communities establishing different global sign systems.
Paper Garrod S., Fay N., Walker B., & Swibida, N. (2010) Can iterative learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies Vol.11 pp 33-50 [expand abstract]
Abstract: This paper contrasts two influential theoretical accounts of language change and evolution – Iterated Learning and Social Coordination. The contrast is based on an experiment that compares drawings produced with Garrod et al’s (2007) ‘pictionary’ task with those produced in an Iterated Learning version of the same task. The main finding is that Iterated Learning does not lead to the systematic simplification and increased symbolicity of graphical signs produced in the standard interactive version of the task. The paper concludes with a comparison of the two accounts in relation to how each promotes signs that are efficient, systematic and learnable.
Paper Galantucci B., & Garrod S. (2010) Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying the emergence and the evolution of human communication Interaction Studies Vol.11 pp 1-13
Paper Pickering M.J. & Garrod S. (2009) Prediction and embodiment in dialogue European Journal of Social Psychology (39) pp 1162-1168 [expand abstract]
Abstract: We argue that embodiment (via use of action-based representations) plays a crucial role in dialogue. To illustrate the argument we use studies of language comprehension. We first compare two distinct literatures, one concerned with the activation of non-linguistic action-based representations of meaning (e.g., Barsalou, 2008), and the other with representations of linguistic form associated with language production (e.g., Pickering & Garrod, 2007). We then argue that both types of embodiment support emulation and prediction. Hence, such embodiment enables addressees to anticipate both what their partner is likely to say next and what she is likely to do. We conclude by suggesting that such anticipation is essential for fluent and timely social interactions.
Paper Garrod S. & Pickering M.J. (2009) Joint action, interactive alignment and dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science Vol.1(1) pp 292-304 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Dialogue is a joint action at different levels. At the highest level, the goal of interlocutors is to align their mental representations. This emerges from joint activity at lower levels, both concerned with linguistic decisions (e.g., choice of words) and non-linguistic processes (e.g., alignment of posture or speech rate). Because of the high-level goal, the interlocutors are particularly concerned with close coupling at these lower levels. As we illustrate with examples, this means that imitation and entrainment are particularly pronounced during interactive communication. We then argue that the mechanisms underlying such processes involve covert imitation of interlocutors’ communicative behavior, leading to emulation of their expected behavior. In other words, communication provides a very good example of predictive emulation, in a way that leads to successful joint activity.
Paper Kreiner H., Sturt P. & Garrod s. (2008) Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye movements Journal of Memory and Language Vol.58(2) pp 239-261 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Readers immediately slow down when an anaphor (e.g. herself) refers to an antecedent that mismatches in stereotypical gender (e.g. minister). The mismatch-cost has been attributed to a clash between the gender of the pronoun and the gender associated with the stereotypical role noun. However, the nature of such stereotypic gender is still controversial; according to the mental models approach it is inferred from world knowledge, while according to a lexical view it is stored as part of the lexical representation. We report two eye-tracking experiments designed to investigate the processing of stereotypical gender. In these experiments stereotypical nouns (e.g. minister) are contrasted with definitional nouns (e.g. king) in which gender information is part of the definition of the word. Experiment 1 shows that in anaphora sentences, where the role noun is presented earlier than the reflexive that conveys gender information, stereotypical and definitional gender nouns lead to a similar mismatch-cost. Experiment 2 shows that in cataphora sentences, where the reflexive precedes the stereotypical noun, a mismatch-cost is exhibited only for definitional gender nouns. These results indicate that stereotypical gender can be overridden when gender is specified by prior discourse, unlike lexically defined gender. We discuss the differences between these noun types and their implications for the representation and processing of stereotypical gender.
Paper Fay N., Garrod S.,& Roberts L. (2008) The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B) Vol.363 pp 3553-3561 [expand abstract]
Abstract: This paper assesses whether human communication systems undergo the same progressive adaptation seen in animal communication systems and concrete artifacts. Four experiments compared the fitness of ad hoc sign systems created under different conditions when participants play a graphical communication task. Experiment 1 demonstrated that when participants are organized into interacting communities a series of signs evolve that enhance individual learning and promote efficient decoding. No such benefits are found for signs that result from the local interactions of isolated pairs of interlocutors. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the decoding benefits associated with community evolved signs cannot be attributed to superior sign encoding or detection. Experiment 4 revealed that naïve overseers were better able to identify the meaning of community evolved signs when compared with isolated pair developed signs. Hence, the decoding benefits for community evolved signs arise from their greater residual iconicity. We argue that community evolved sign systems undergo a process of communicative selection and adaptation that promotes optimized sign systems. This results from the interplay between sign diversity and a global alignment constraint; pair-wise interaction introduces a range of competing signs and the need to globally align on a single sign-meaning mapping for each referent applies selection pressure.
Paper Garrod S., Fay N., Lee J., Oberlander J. & MacLeod T. (2007) Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science (31) pp 961-988 [expand abstract]
Abstract: It has been suggested that iconic graphical signs evolve into symbolic graphical signs through repeated usage. We report a series of interactive graphical communication experiments using a ‘pictionary’ task to establish the conditions under which the evolution occurs. Experiment 1 rules out a simple repetition based account in favour of an account that requires feedback and interaction between communicators. Experiment 2 shows how the degree of interaction affects the evolution of signs according a process of grounding. Experiment 3 confirms the prediction that those not involved directly in the interaction have trouble interpreting the graphical signs produced in Experiment 1. On the basis of these results we argue that icons evolve into symbols as a consequence of the systematic shift in the locus of information from the sign to the users’ memory of the sign’s usage supported by an interactive grounding process.
Paper Pickering M.J. & Garrod S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences (11) pp 105-110PDF [expand abstract]
Abstract: We present the case that language comprehension involves making simultaneous predictions at different linguistic levels, and that these predictions are generated by the language production system. Recent research suggests that ease of comprehending predictable elements is due to prediction rather than facilitated integration, and that comprehension is accompanied by covert imitation. We argue that comprehenders use these processes to construct a forward model (or emulator) using the production system, and combine predictions with the input dynamically. Such a process helps explain the extreme rapidity of comprehension and the robust interpretation of ambiguous or noisy input. The language emulator framework is in line with a general trend in Cognitive Science to incorporate action systems into perceptual systems and has broad implications for understanding the links between language production and comprehension.
Paper Pickering M.J. & Garrod S. (2006) Alignment as the basis of successful communication Research on Language and Computation (4) pp 203-228PDF
Paper Pickering M.J. & Garrod S. (2004) Towards a mechanistic Psychology of dialogue Behavioral and Brain Sciences (27) pp 169-226PDF [expand abstract]
Abstract: Traditional mechanistic accounts of language processing derive almost entirely from the study of monologue. Yet, the most natural and basic form of language use is dialogue. As a result, these accounts may only offer limited theories of the mechanisms that underlie language processing in general. We propose a mechanistic account of dialogue, the interactive alignment account, and use it to derive a number of predictions about basic language processes. The account assumes that, in dialogue, the linguistic representations employed by the interlocutors become aligned at many levels, as a result of a largely automatic process. This process greatly simplifies production and comprehension in dialogue. After considering the evidence for the interactive alignment model, we concentrate on three aspects of processing that follow from it. It makes use of a simple interactive inference mechanism, enables the development of local dialogue routines that greatly simplify language processing, and explains the origins of self-monitoring in production. We consider the need for a grammatical framework that is designed to deal with language in dialogue rather than monologue, and discuss a range of implications of the account.
Paper Garrod S. & Pickering M.J. (2004) Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences (8) pp 8-11PDF [expand abstract]
Abstract: Whereas most of us find it difficult to present a speech or even listen to one, all of us are very good at talking to each other. This may seem a rather obvious and banal observation, but from a psycholinguistic point of view the ease with which we can converse is paradoxical. Everything in psycholinguistic accounts of language processing would suggest that monologue – preparing and listening to speeches- should be more straightforward than dialogue – holding a conversation.
Conference MacLeod T.J. & Garrod S.C. (2003) Where is the Twist in the Tongue Twister? Dysfluencies following Spoken and Heard Twister Strings AmLap 2003 Conference Proceedings Glasgow, UK
Conference Fay N., Garrod S.C. & MacLeod T.J. (2003) On the Evolution of ‘Good’ Representations EuroCogSci 2003 Conference Proceedings Osnabrueck, Germany
Paper Carletta J., Anderson A.H. & Garrod S.C. (2002) Seeing eye to eye: an account of grounding and understanding in work groups Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Vol.9(1) pp 26-45
Paper McCotter M.V., Gosselin F.G., Garrod S.C. & Schyns P.G. (2002) Superstitious perceptions reveal representations of spatial propositions Perception (31) pp 110
Paper Garrod S.C. & Poesio M. (2001) Plumbing semantic depths in Amsterdam Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol.6(4) pp 150-151 [expand abstract]
Abstract: The 13th Amsterdam Colloquium was held at the Institute for Logic, Language and Linguistics at the University of Amsterdam, on 17–19 December 2001.
Paper Garrod S.C. & Terras M. (2000) The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution Journal of Memory and Language Vol.42(4) pp 526-544 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Resolving links between subsequent referents (e.g., the car) and open discourse roles (as in Keith drove to London yesterday. The car kept overheating) is crucial for discourse understanding. This article investigates the contribution of lexical semantic factors (e.g., that drive implies using a vehicle) as compared to more general contextual factors in the on-line resolution of such links. We report an eye-tracking experiment that measures immediate and delayed effects of both kinds of information as readers resolve the reference. The results indicate that lexical information dominates the initial linking process with more general contextual influences emerging later. They are discussed in terms of the distinction between early bonding and subsequent resolution processes that has been proposed for other kinds of anaphoric interpretation (Sanford, Garrod, Lucas, & Henderson, 1983).
Paper Fay N., Garrod S.C. & Carletta J. (2000) Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size Psychological Science Vol.11(6) pp 481-486 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Current models draw a broad distinction between communication as dialogue and communication as monologue. The two kinds of models have different implications for who influences whom in a group discussion. If the discussion is like interactive dialogue, group members should be influenced most by those with whom they interact in the discussion; if it is like serial monologue, they should be influenced most by the dominant speaker. The experiments reported here show that in small, 5-person groups, the communication is like dialogue and members are influenced most by those with whom they interact in the discussion. However, in large, 10-person groups, the communication is like monologue and members are influenced most by the dominant speaker. The difference in mode of communication is explained in terms of how speakers in the two sizes of groups design their utterances for different audiences.
Paper Garrod S.C., Ferrier G. & Campbell S. (1999) In and On: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions Cognition Vol.72(2) pp 167-189 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Spatial prepositions such as in and on seem to denote semantically indeterminate spatial relations. This reflects, in part, the physical relationships between the objects in the scenes that they are used to portray. We argue that such physical relationships are best represented in terms of an inherently dynamic functional geometry which incorporates notions of location control. Two experiments are reported. They investigate the degree to which independent judgements of location control predict choice of description across a range of scenes. The results show that judgements of location control predict viewer's choice of description under certain circumstances. In the absence of prototypical geometric relations, control information has a strong influence on choice of description. However, when the scenes portray prototypical geometric relations, control information has less of an effect. The results support a hybrid account of the semantic representation underlying the prepositions with both a geometric and a functional component to it.
Book Garrod S.C. & Sanford A.J. (1999) Incrementality in discourse understanding in: H.Van Oostendorp & S.R.Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Paper Sanford A.J. & Garrod S.C. (1998) The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension Discourse Processes Vol.26(2&3) pp 159-190 [expand abstract]
Abstract: We argue that different theories of text comprehension give the use of world knowledge different degrees of importance. Although all acknowledge it as a major feature of comprehension, just when and how it is utilized appears to split theories into those that are based on propositions as building blocks and those that are not. We argue for an account that does not rely on the proposition as an early building block, the scenario-mapping and focus account, based on Sanford and Garrod's (1981) earlier work. We argue that interpretation at a pre- and subpropositional level is both an empirical fact and a theoretical necessity and that the primary task of the language processor is to map language input at a (largely) subpropositional level onto background knowledge. We illustrate the utility of the approach with a discussion of the representation of plurals and quantified statements. Although some of our claims are consistent with both the construction-integration account and minimalism, we argue that the core process of scenario mapping; is essentially absent from these other formulations.
Paper Garrod S.C. (1998) How groups co-ordinate their concepts and terminology: implications for medical informatics Methods Inf. Med. Vol.37(4) pp 471-476 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Conceptual and terminological systems are established and maintained by the communities who use them. This paper reports experiments which investigate the role of communication and interaction in the process. The experiments show that isolated pairs of communicators and virtual communities of interacting pairs naturally converge on their own conceptual and terminological systems when confronted with a common task. The results also indicate that the system converged on is optimal for that particular group engaged in that particular task. These findings are discussed in relation to the increasing use of tightly coordinated medical teams and its implications for getting them to adopt standardized medical terminologies.
Paper Carletta J., Garrod S.C. & Fraser-Krauss H. (1998) Communication in Autonomous and Traditional work place groups: The consequences for innovation Small Group Research Vol.29(5) pp 531-559
Book West M., Garrod S.C. & Carletta J. (1997) Group Decision-Making and Effectiveness: Unexplored Boundaries in: Cooper, C.L. & Jackson, S.E. (Eds.). Creating tomorrow's organisations: A handbook for future research in organisational behaviour pp 293-319 Chichester, England: John Wiley
Paper Doherty-Sneddon G., Anderson A.H., O'Malley C., Langton S., Garrod S.C. & Bruce V. (1997) Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied Vol.3(2) pp 105-125 [expand abstract]
Abstract: This article examined communication and task performance in face-to-face, copresent, and video-mediated communication (VMC). Study 1 showed that when participants in a collaborative problem-solving task could both see and hear each other, the structure of their dialogues differed compared with dialogues obtained when they only heard each other. The audio-only conversations had more words, and these extra utterances often provided and elicited verbal feedback functions, which visual signals can deliver when available. Study 2, however, showed that high-quality VMC did not appear to deliver the same benefits as face-to-face, copresent interaction. It appears that novelty, attenuation, and remoteness all may have contributed to the effects found––factors that should be considered by designers of remote video-conferencing systems.
Paper Garrod S.C., Freudenthal D. & Boyle E. (1994) The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse Journal of Memory and Language Vol.33(1) pp 39-68 [expand abstract]
Abstract: Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence against the current discourse representation. This paper examines the time course of such sentence resolution processes in two eye-tracking experiments. The experimental passages contained verbs depicting contextually congruent or incongruent events depending upon which of two possible antecedents were assigned to an anaphor. In Experiment 1, immediate effects of detecting the incongruence were found in first pass fixations on the verb but only when the sentences contained pronouns referring unambiguously to focused discourse antecedents. In Experiment 2 where matching name and definite description anaphors were used, the congruence effects were delayed until the second pass refixations of the verb and anaphor. The results are interpreted in relation to the different discourse roles played by different anaphoric devices and considered in relation to Sanford and Garrod's (1981) Memory Focus model.
Paper Garrod S.C. & Sanford A.J. (1988) Discourse models as interfaces between language and the spatial world Journal of Semantics (6) pp 147-160