 |
Ellis D.A. & Jenkins R. (2012) Weekday Affects Attendance Rate for Medical Appointments: Large-Scale Data Analysis and Implications PLoS ONE Vol.7(12) http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051365 [expand abstract] Abstract: The financial cost of missed appointments is so great that even a small percentage reduction in Did Not Attend (DNA) rate could save significant sums of money. Previous studies have identified many factors that predict DNA rate, including patient age, gender, and transport options. However, it is not obvious how healthcare providers can use this information to improve attendance, as such factors are not under their control. One factor that is under administrative control is appointment scheduling. Here we asked whether DNA rate could be reduced by altering scheduling policy.
In Study 1, we examined attendance records for 4,538,294 outpatient hospital appointments across Scotland between January 1st 2008 and December 31st 2010. DNA rate was highest for Mondays (11%), lowest for Fridays (9.7%), and decreased monotonically over the week (Monday-Friday comparison [Ï?2(1, N = 1,585,545) = 722.33, p < 0.0001]; Relative Risk Reduction 11.8%). This weekly decline was present for male and female patient groups of all ages, but was steeper for younger age groups.
In Study 2, we examined attendance records for 10,895 appointments at a single GP clinic in Glasgow. Here again, DNA rate was highest for Mondays (6.2%), lowest for Fridays (4.2%), and decreased monotonically over the week (Monday-Friday comparison [Ï?2(1, N = 4767) = 9.20, p < 0.01]; Relative Risk Reduction 32.3%).
In two very different settings, appointments at the beginning of the week were more likely to be missed than appointments at the end of the week. We suggest that DNA rate could be significantly reduced by preferentially loading appointments onto high-attendance days. |
 |
Burton A.M., Jenkins R. & Schweinberger S.R. (2011) Mental representations of familiar faces British Journal of Psychology Vol.102 pp 943-958 |
 |
Jenkins R., White D., Van Montfort X. & Burton A.M. (2011) Variability in photos of the same face Cognition Vol.121 pp 313-323 |
 |
Burton A.M. & Jenkins R. (2011) Unfamiliar face perception Handbook of face perception (Oxford University Press). Calder A.J., Rhodes G., Johnson M.H. & Haxby J.V. (Eds). pp 287-306 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Burton A.M (2011) Stable face representations Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Vol.366 pp 1671-1683 |
 |
Burton A.M., Bindemann M., Langton S.R.H., Schweinberger S.R. & Jenkins R. (2009) Gaze perception requires focused attention: Evidence from an interference task Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance (35) pp 108-118 |
 |
Duchaine B., Jenkins R., Germine L. & Calder A. (2009) Normal gaze discrimination and adaptation in seven prosopagnosics Neuropsychologia Vol.47 pp 2029-2036 |
 |
Wiseman R., Jenkins R. (2009) The New Scientist face experiment New Scientist (2695) pp 30-31 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Wiseman R. (2009) Darwin Illusion: Evolution in a blink of the eye Perception Vol.38 pp 1413-1415 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Garrod S.C. (2008) First impressions: The science of social interaction Britain In 2009 (1) pp 92 |
 |
Calder A.J., Jenkins R., Cassel A. & Clifford C.W.G. (2008) Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a non-opponent multichannel system Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (137) pp 244-261 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Burton A.M. (2008) Limitations in facial identification Justice of the Peace Vol.172(1-2) pp 4-6 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Burton A.M. (2008) 100% accuracy in automatic face recognition Science Vol.319(5862) pp 435 |
 |
Jenkins R. & Burton A.M. (2008) Response to comment on “100% accuracy in automatic face recognition” Science (321) pp 912d |
 |
Bishop S.J., Jenkins R. & Lawrence A.D. (2007) Neural processing of threat: Effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limits Cerebral Cortex (17) pp 1595-1603 |
 |
Calder A.J., Beaver J.D., Winston J., Dolan R.J., Jenkins R., Eger E. & Henson R.N.A. (2007) Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus. Current Biology Vol.17(1) pp 20-25 |
 |
Bindemann M., Jenkins R. & Burton A.M. (2007) A bottleneck in face identification: repetition priming from flanker faces. Experimental Psychology Vol.54(3) pp 192-201 |
 |
Schweinberger S.R., Kloth N. & Jenkins R. (2007) Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation Neuroreport (18) pp 693-696 |
 |
Jenkins R. (2007) The lighter side of gaze perception Perception (36) pp 1266-1268 |
 |
Jenkins R., Burton A.M. & White D. (2006) Face recognition from unconstrained images: Progress with prototypes. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition pp 25-30 |
 |
Jenkins R., Beaver J.D. & Calder A.J. (2006) I thought you were looking at me! Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science (17) pp 506-514 |
 |
Bindemann M., Burton A.M. & Jenkins R. (2005) Capacity limits for face processing. Cognition (98) pp 177-197 |
 |
Burton A.M., Jenkins R., Hancock P.B.J. & White D. (2005) Robust representations for face recognition. Cognitive Psychology (51) pp 256-284 |
 |
Bindemann M., Burton A.M., Hooge I.T.C., Jenkins R. & DeHaan E.H. (2005) Faces retain attention Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (12) pp 1048-1053 |
 |
Jenkins R., Lavie N. & Driver J. (2005) Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (12) pp 314-320 |
 |
Bonner L., Burton A.M., Jenkins R. & McNeill A. (2003) Meet the Simpsons: Top-down effects in face learning. Perception (32) pp 1159-1168 |
 |
Jenkins R., Driver J. & Lavie N. (2003) Ignoring famous faces: Category-specific dilution of distractor interference Perception & Psychophysics Vol.65(2) pp 298-309 |
 |
Jenkins R., Burton A.M. & Ellis A.W. (2002) Long-term effects of covert face recognition Cognition Vol.86(2) B43-52 [expand abstract] Abstract: Covert face recognition has previously been thought to produce only very short-lasting effects. In this study we demonstrate that manipulating subjects' attentional load affects explicit, but not implicit memory for faces, and that implicit effects can persist over much longer intervals than is normally reported. Subjects performed letter-string tasks of high vs. low perceptual load (Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfomance. 21, 451-468.), while ignoring task-irrelevant celebrity faces. Memory for the faces was then assessed using (a) a surprise recognition test for the celebrities' names, and (b) repetition priming in a face familiarity task. The load manipulation strongly influenced explicit recognition memory, but had no effect on repetition priming from the same items. Moreover, faces from the high load condition produced the same amount of priming whether they were explicitly remembered or not. This result resolves a long-standing anomaly in the face recognition literature, and is discussed in relation to covert processing in prosopagnosia. |